Social IT revolution calling for new ways to lead

New York Times columnist and author Tom Friedman had a fascinating article in yesterday’s paper about the United States’ two current revolutions — Wall St. and Silicon Valley. In the article Friedman includes Marc Benioff’s description of the IT revolution, which he calls SOCIAL.

  • S = speed
  • O = open. “If you don’t have an open environment inside your company or country, these new tools will blow you wide open.”
  • C = collaboration. “This revolution enables people to organize themselves within companies and societies into loosely coupled teams to take on any kind of challenge — from designing a new product to taking down a government.”
  • I = individuals. “People are able to reach around the globe to start something or collaborate on something farther, faster, deeper, cheaper than ever before — as individuals.”
  • A = alignment. “The power of social media is that it is easier than ever to both articulate, and reinforce, the vision and values that create and inspire alignment.”
  • L = leadership. “In a SOCIAL world leadership has to be a mix of bottom-up and top-down. Leaders need to inspire, enable, and empower everything coming up from below in a company or a social movement and then edit and sculpt it into a vision from above into a final product.”

From my observation working with large organizations, the greatest opportunity — and challenge — for companies is the Land the A. The I’s seem to be quickly  adopting the S, O and C.

As companies plan to roll-out internal social collaboration platforms like Sharepoint, Newsgator and Jive, they worry a lot about putting rules and guidelines around what employees can and cannot do.  Many fear what might happen if employees can connect freely. How are we going to prevent “them” from saying or doing inappropriate things, they ponder.

The bigger question to me is how is social changing how we lead? 

  • How are we going to help and recognize managers to do and say more appropriate things that will make a difference to business outcomes?
  • What new competencies will help managers tap into the extraordinary potential value?
  • What traditional management practices are no longer as relevant — and what is emerging as more relevant?
  • What might be possible if leaders were more passionate, and less fearful about SOCIAL?

Ignore the obstacles


Are we wasting too much time solving problems?

We spend a lot of time solving problems in business. Some days I feel like we’re benevolent pit bulls, sinking our teeth into root causes, doing current and future state analysis, and constructing detailed roadmaps for breaking down the obstacles.

But what about the other way? Instead of focusing on the negatives, what if we obsessed on our aspirations and strengths? What would happen if spent more time imagining the value of doing more of what we’re especially good at?

Management guru Peter Drucker believed that building on an organization’s strengths snuffs out many of the problems:

“The task of organizational leadership is to create alignment of strengths in ways that make a system’s weaknesses irrelevant.”

Appreciative Inquiry authors and experts David Cooperrider and Diana Whitney share similar views:

“The positive core of an organizational life is one of the greatest and largely unrecognized resources in the field of change management today…Human systems grow in the direction of what they persistently ask questions about, and this propensity is strongest and most sustainable when the means and ends of inquiry are positively correlated.”

At your next management meeting, think about carving out some time to ask new questions around your strengths. Based on my experience you’ll uncover some remarkably motivating ideas, and you’ll  find the energy to pursue those positive opportunities in a way that you just don’t get with solving problems.

A management consultant’s chart on the ROI of eliminating 11 things

Today’s prompt: 11 things. What are 11 things your life doesn’t need in 2011? How will you go about eliminating them? How will getting rid of these 11 things change your life?

As a management consultant I felt compelled to do an analysis chart. Before acting on a proposal all clients want to understand the concrete value of the recommendations. If the value — or ROI — is great enough, they commit.  If not, the proposal goes into limbo or quickly dies.

(Hint: always make the value section the most important part of any proposal. Second hint: decision makers prefer charts and graphs over narratives.)

In developing my 11 things to eliminate “proposal” I believe I may have sold myself on the value of acting on all 11.  A good use of time on an early Saturday morning!

This post is part of a 31-day blogging challenge called reverb10, responding to writing prompts that are designed to elicit reflections on 2010, and hopes for 2011. You can find out more about it here.

The change dilemma

The dilemma of change is all around us. School reform. Government reform. New business and marketing models.  There’s no lack of ideas on how to innovate in diverse fields. The big hairy audacious problem is getting people to change.

I’ve seen some brilliant, innovative ideas proposed to companies this year that didn’t happen. Not because the ideas weren’t sound, but rather because people didn’t want to learn new skills, change behavior, work outside their comfort zones, hire new types of talent with which they are unfamiliar.

The energy invested in the politics to stop new approaches can be formidable.   Being on the outside as a consultant I get to watch objectively as people battle to maintain the status quo. It’s astonishing. The talent to block change is so nuanced and skilled.  But how depressing. Not just because it stunts an organization’s growth, but these change naysayers are killing their careers.

Watching these incredible situations has presented me with my own professional development agenda this year: change. (There’s something about the back-to-school calendar that forces me to set my own learning goals this time of year.)

I’m a practical sort, so what I want to learn is how to make change real. Change management theories are intriguing, but that’s not for me.  Here’s what I’m exploring in my change quest.

Changing one leader at a time: people change organizations, not policies, best practices or methodologies. So I’m starting a 15-month Courage to Lead program in the fall.  I told one of the program leaders that I like the concept of courage in leadership, where you learn to face down your fears. She told me that her intent is for leaders to feel “compelled” to lead. Fascinating. I’m also helping Harvard’s new non-profit Institute of Coaching to build its membership  and in doing so I’m learning about the field, which I thought was soft and squishy, but is actually invaluable especially in helping people change in ways that give them purpose and fulfillment. I’m also learning that much of any consulting includes some element of coaching, and many of us can benefit from the research and practices of the coaching field, even if we never label ourselves as coaches.

Required learning: for one of the largest corporations in the world I’m developing an extensive social media e-Learning program, which will be required of the company’s communications and marketing professionals. Social business and communications skills are becoming  fundamental competencies, but people aren’t voluntarily learning at the rates companies would like. So the program will be required and linked to their performance assessments.  To get people to change, one important approach is to  tie the desired new behavior or skills  to what people most care about — their salary, bonuses, and chances for promotion.

Telling stories: in this online social media era, I think in-person storytelling is more powerful than ever. I’m working with The Moth, a storytelling non-profit, to create a program for a corporate client where employee story slams will be held across the country (and hopefully the world).  What I find fascinating about storytelling is that it helps build a deeper sense of community and trust in an organization, two elements necessary for any change to have a chance in hell of happening. Also, the “authenticity” word has been used and abused way too much in social media conversations in the past couple of years.  I believe that the most authentic corporate stories are from its employees and customers — unedited.

Creating clarity through infographics: Meaning making requires that people see patterns and relevancy to them.  I’m quite fascinated with how infographics can create this clarity from complexity, helping people see ideas in new ways.  While my other change assignments are big and focus on behavior, I remain fascinated with innovating communications, particularly the way people gain understanding.  I’ve long been a fan of Edward Tufte, and am now enjoying seeing how to use technology (carefully) in new ways to tell a story with data. (Here’s a link to some interesting infographics related to marketing and social media.)

“They must often change, who would be constant in happiness or wisdom.” Confucius

What’s your organization’s social media quotient?

All strategic social media initiatives require change management to some degree. To figure out an organization’s social media “readiness” and how much change management will be needed – and in what areas – SAP’s Steve Mann has developed a “social quotient” test/analysis. Where does your company score?