This convinces social media skeptics

Need help convincing your boss that social media is a major phenomenon deserving budgets, approval and buy-in? Show him or her this live data counter developed by Gary Hayes that tracks  things like number of new blogs posts, members added to Facebook, videos watched on YouTube, downloaded iPhone apps — EVERY SECOND.

Here’s a visual of just five minutes of data. The live feed is much more compelling.

I recommended that a client use it to open her presentation to  the executive members of one of the biggest companies in the world. It got a big “wow” and opened minds to the need to  do business differently.

Social Media CountsJPEG

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter

Google Sidewiki: 5 things businesses should do

Google just introduced SideWiki, which allows anyone to add information in a sidebar next to any Web page. Google positions SideWiki as a way to contribute helpful information to any site, providing additional insights to what’s on the page. Nice. They even show a nice example with John Maeda, president of RISD, adding a comment about Cooper-Hewitt.

For corporate people who have had to fight with legal and senior management to get a corporate blog or to  allow people to post comments on the corporate blog, this is big news.  I started saying “there is no control” of corporate information back in 2005. And now, really, there is no control.

If people don’t agree with the company’s information, they get write their views in Google Sidewiki, which appears as a browser sidebar. If they think your marketing claims are misleading, they can write that in Sidewiki. If they think a competitor’s product alternative is a better choice, up it goes. (Or should I say “side it goes” as the Google Sidewiki opens to the left side of the Web page.)

While the product was just launched , I think there are five things marketers and corporate communications people need to pay attention to:

1.  Claim  your Google Sidewiki for your Web site; that way your company information will always appear at the top of the wiki. Bill Hartzer has a good tutorial on how to do this.

2. Give management the heads up about Sidewiki before you’re called on the carpet for not knowing about “this.” Reassure people that there are unlikely to be a lot of bad comments, unless of course there is a reason for them. People can only add to  Sidewiki if they use their full name.  As bloggers have found, simply asking people for their name and a legitimate email  filters out most ranters and haters.

3. Respond to people who comment in the Sidewiki, just as you would — I hope — if they commented on your company blog, forum or community.  Engaging in the right way can build brand fans, correct misperceptions, and help you learn how to make your company better.

4. No corporate blog? This is the time to get one. If you have no way to easily and quickly communicate your company views via social media, you’re at risk.    SideWiki is another example of making it easy for people to have a voice.  They’d probably be interested in hearing from people in your company in their real person voices, too. So what are you waiting for? Make it easy for people in your company to share their views.

5.  Follow the trend and follow what people write — not just on your pages, but on your competitors’, on industry sites, on blogs and online magazine pages covering your industry.  SideWiki could provide some incredible intelligence for sales, marketing, customer service, and product innovation.

Here’s a video with more information.  You can also follow @googlesidewiki on Twitter to see track adoption and issues. It’s too soon to tell how influential Google Sidewiki might become, but it’s not too soon to start paying attention.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter

Responses to Marketing News Radio questions

Really enjoyed the great questions from Wednesday’s  AMA Marketing News Radio program, “Beyond Buzz: Succeeding in a Conversational Marketing 2.0 World,” hosted by the gracious and smart David Kinard. Here are responses to questions that we didn’t have time to get to during the show. Thanks for tuning in!

Can social networking marketing strategies work for B2B industries?  If so, how do we find the relevant networks for our industry (in my case, it happens to be architectural and commercial development)?

Absolutely. Set up several Google Alerts with key words about your industry to begin to see places. Think about using key words that will bring up social networks, like “Industrial architect forums” or” industrial architect blogs.” To see how large the community or blog might be go to Compete, plug in the URL and it will tell give you the # of unique site visitors. Another tip: when using Google use search term “top ten architecture blogs.” I find those top-ten lists a good way to find good sites.

Is there somewhere I can go to learn the practical how-to’s for setting up Twitter, Flickr, YouTube and other similar web programs?  Every talk I hear seems to say how important they are, but none take the time to walk through exactly how to set them up or use them.

Here’s a great list of “how to” blog posts on those topics. Very detailed.   Another source can be found here. (Great little instructional videos.)

I work for a contemporary art gallery and our Internet service currently rests on the city’s server. Therefore, we are blocked from such sites as Facebook and MySpace. We’re not even allowed to post pictures on flikr or Kodak gallery, etc. The city sees them as non-work related sites, understandably. Any suggestions on how we should “pitch” to the city how necessary it is for us to have access to these social communication tools?

Here’s a BBC report on why “Bosses should embrace Facebook” based on a new study.  To make your case find additional data and examples to show how governments – city, state and local – are using social media to be more effective, responsive and citizen-friendly. Build they case for the trend; create a Google Alert “Government use of social media.” (Here’s one example)  Gather the best facts and examples and enlist other organizations like yours who feel the same way. Maybe even start a local social movement, using a blog or Facebook, to raise visibility of the issue. Get some ideas on how to force change from this post, Social media lessons from union organizers.

What tools do you use to track conversation re: your product on the web?

There’s a whole host of tools you can use to track conversations, from the free Google Alerts to Radian6 (low-to-mid) to TruCast from Visible Technologies (mid-to-high). The right choice depends on your business needs. If you’re not doing anything yet, at a minimum set up Google Alerts about your company, your category, industry trends in your field.

And to track conversations on Twitter try services such as Twilert, which will email you once a day with mentions of the keywords you care about, or set up a dashboard on Tweetdeck or Tweetgrid which you can configure and bookmark in your browser to track keywords about your company, products and competitors.

Once we’ve established a presence on a social network, and have the current social networkers buzzing, how do we drive potential customers to that network?

Promote the value (and URL) of the social network to your customers in all the ways you communicate with them.  Emails, brochures, sales presentations, “on hold” telephone message, on employees’ email signatures, etc. Also make it easy for people to tell others about the network by including a lot of social sharing tools in the network to- email, delicious tags, Digg, Twitter, Stumpleupon, Facebook.

Also keep an eye out for particularly engaged members who you can enlist and empower to act as ambassadors for the network.

You referred to the Air Force formula to use as a guideline. Where would I locate that?

You can find it here.

What the pitfalls or key things to look our for when using Facebook or LinkedIn for recruiting and positioning/branding?

The pitfall is using it as a one-way message board promoting your company.  The way to get value is to provide value. You have to give to get.

Use these networks to provide information that’s helpful and interesting to your audience. Or use it o ask questions, like “we’re looking for a sales executive with xx years experience in the xyz industry; compensation: $120-150k.  Know anyone?”    Guy Kawasaki offers this good advice, “Ten Ways to Use Linked In for Business.” Note, however, that Facebook and LinkedIn do have their limitations. For many businesses, there’s not a whole lot of value for them with Facebook.

I suspect that there will be discussion about social networking sites and their effectiveness as a relationship building/marketing tool.

Most definitely. You can find much more information about this topic in this free e-book, Marketing in 2009.

Any other questions? If so, please add them here and I’ll get back to you. Again, thanks for listening.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter

Insights from word clouds

Rob Kozinets, professor of marketing at York University, has been writing about the meaning and insights we can glean from word clouds.

In the play, in that visual appeal, I think there is something deeper that can happen. Because we get some good analysis packed into an at-a-glance form, I think we have opportunities to use that ultimate piece of ’software,’ the human mind and imagination, to glean insight from these word pictures.

I think Rob is onto something. I took my annual professional/personal manifesto and put it through Wordle, a free world cloud tool, and found a fascinating picture. In fact, the picture is more motivating and guiding for me than the words on a page. The words that “pop” are obviously especially important to me. Yet I hadn’t really taken time to think about what they really mean until seeing them.

I like Rob’s wrap about the topic: “Word cloud: toy, art, or serious research tool. Why should we have to choose?”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter

Mind mapping helps us see differently

Mind mapping is an incredibly helpful way to brainstorm, solve problems and actively “doodle” to see possibilities. Raj Dash has a good post over at The Freelance Switch, suggesting that mind mapping gets us into a new mindset, helping us to heed Einstein’s advice: “You cannot solve problems by thinking within the same framework or mindset that discovered the problems.”

Some people like using mind mapping software. I find that sitting on the floor with giant sheets of paper and drawing with different colored marketers opens me up to many more ideas. I guess sitting at the Mac to brainstorm is till too much of my usual framework.

PS — this is a useful technique when running brainstorm sessions. I often ask teams to “name” their maps at the end, which helps people articulate what they’ve created/learned/solved.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter

Cool tools: Silobreaker and HubDub

Two new services featured at Demo 08 are big hits at our office and at my house: Silobreaker? (office) and HubDub (home, my husband in particular).

[photopress:Silobreaker_1.jpg,full,centered]

Silobreaker provides contextual and graphical search results, allowing you to “see” a map with the hot spots where news is happening, create trend graphs, and, my favorite, see a network map of the search items that visually shows contextual relationships among the items. This latter feature is particularly helpful in understanding what issues are most closely related, how close — or far apart — your company may be from an issue of industry significance, and what issues are rather irrelevant. Here’s a network map I created from searching on “social media” and “social networking.”? I see value for this service for competitive insights, corporate issues management, brand positioning and issues monitoring.

For more about Silobreaker, check out this post from Patti Anklam.

I fear my husband is addicted to HubDub, a week-old service that lets people forecast how news stories, sports events, financial markets and other happenings are likely to turn out. The addictive part is that you can compete in the leaderboard feature; the more and better your predictions, the higher your leaderboard ranking. I hope my husband;s business sales don’t show an inverse relationship to his leaderboard rankings.

The value of HubDub?? it certainly gets people more involved with news and issues., and has potential as an educational too. And it’s much safer than gambling.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter

If you're naked, make sure you're buff: what language says about the person

I’m guest blogging over at the International Association of Online Communicators. Here’s today’s post.

What does a person’s writing say about the person? Plenty, especially if you learn how to use the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) program developed by James Pennebaker and colleagues at the University of Texas at Austin.

You run text through the program and it categorizes words into 70 linguistic or psychologically-relevant categories. I inputted the several recent blog posts from three popular CEO bloggers — Paul Levy, CEO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Bob Lutz, vice chairman of GM, and Bill Marriott — and here are the partial results:

LIWC Dimension

Bob Lutz, GM

Paul Levy, Beth Israel

Bill Marriott

LIWC formal texts

Self-references (honesty)

3.79

2.47

4.55

4.2

Social words (more outgoing)

5.26

6.23

9.62

8.0

Positive emotion words (more optimistic)

1.78

2.85

3.26

2.6

Negative emotion words (anxiety levels)

0.39

1.14

0.86

1.6

Overall cognitive words (How actively thinking about topic)

4.87

5.18

3.09

5.4

Big words (Higher grades, tend to be less emotional)

18.72

25.52

15.72

19.6


Some admittedly oversimplified takeaways:

· Bill Marriott comes across as most honest, outgoing, and positive.

· Paul Levy appears to be especially intelligent, with highly cognitive and big words; he’s also quite outgoing and more negative than the other two CEO bloggers. Interestingly he’s done an extraordinary job of turning around Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital and has been writing about union issues, which may account for the negative emotion.

· Bob Lutz comes across honest and smart.

What does this have to do with online communications? It’s an area I’m studying and have no answers yet, just some questions I’d like to ask you:

· Should we “test” executives writing and analyze it before they start blogging on behalf of the company? If they score very negative, low on honesty and low on cognitive thinking – would this person be a good representative of the company?

· Does using an analysis tool like this help us be more aware of our selves – and help us change our language, and, in turn, change our behavior?

· Is it a good tool to coach others in communicating in this new conversational world? (Note that many people think that using the first person “I” is not professional and makes you seem too self-absorbed. But linguistics has found that not to be so; use of the first person implies honesty.)

· Should we never talk about this tool as it may scare execs about being naked out in the blogsophere – especially if they aren’t all that buff when it comes to being positive, cognitively complex and honest?

· Lastly, can writing a blog every day make us healthier? (Studies have proven that writing about personal topics 15 – 30 minutes a day improves people’s emotional and physical health.)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter

Unusual scientfic reason for why John Edwards is lagging

Why is John Edwards lagging Clinton and and Obama in the Democratic presidential race? It may be his use of language. Not the words and “messages,” but his style.

A study published in the Journal of Research in Personality, “Winning words: individual differences in linguistic style among U.S. presidential and vice presidential candidates,” computer analyzed the linguistic styles of Bush, Cheney, Kerry and Edwards during the 2004 campaign across six linguistic style categories related to voting behaviors and political personality characteristics.

Some highlights of the findings, by James Pennebaker, Richard Slatcher, Cindy Chung and Lori Stone:

  • Edwards’ language was the most feminine. (Studies show that when asked to describe ” a good president” 61% of the participants characterized the role as masculine and 0% as feminine. The remaining percent were androgynous or undifferentiated.)
  • Edwards’ language use was the least presidential. (The Republicans used much more presidential language than the Democrats. Presidential language is has high levels of articles, prepositions, positive emotions and big words.)
  • Edwards used more depressive language than Bush or Cheney; Kerry was most similar to a depressed person. (Studies show voters are most favorable toward candidates who are the most optimistic.)
  • Edwards and Bush were the least cognitively complex in their use of language. (Cheney was the most cognitively complex — his style being the most concrete, complex, and detached.)
  • Edwards and Cheney were similar in honesty of their language; both of the vice presidential candidates’ language was more honest than Kerry or Bush.

According to James Pennebaker, professor and chair of the psychology department at the University of Texas at Austin and developer of the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software program that categorizes words into linguistic and psychological categories:

“Over the years it has become apparent that is far more important to see how people talked about a given topic than what they were talking about. People’s linguistic styles provide far richer psychological information than their linguistic content.”

It is possible that Edwards’ language use has changed since the last election. Yet this scientific use of language analysis does provide some fascinating clues into why he’s lagging.

PS — I’ll be writing more about what our words can say about us, particularly as it relates to business, when I guest blog at the International Association of Online Communicators next week.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter