<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye to Hillary: voting on feelings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foghound.com/blog/2008/05/12/goodbye-to-hillary-voting-on-feelings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foghound.com/blog/2008/05/12/goodbye-to-hillary-voting-on-feelings/</link>
	<description>Uncovering possibilities, purpose, passion for leadership, marketing, sales</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:11:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lois Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.foghound.com/blog/2008/05/12/goodbye-to-hillary-voting-on-feelings/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>Lois Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foghound.com/262/#comment-549</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rohit. Look forward to reading your book. Why do you think big brands -- especially B2B -- are so reluctant to inject personality and emotion into their marketing?
Lois</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rohit. Look forward to reading your book. Why do you think big brands &#8212; especially B2B &#8212; are so reluctant to inject personality and emotion into their marketing?<br />
Lois</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohit</title>
		<link>http://www.foghound.com/blog/2008/05/12/goodbye-to-hillary-voting-on-feelings/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foghound.com/262/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Lois,

This is a great post because it comes down a fundamental truth about so many businesses and brands as well as politics ... that &quot;featurespeak&quot; is ultimately not what people are buying. Hillary may have the best knowledge and facts at her disposal, for a politician that&#039;s the equivalent of a product having the best features. The problem for her as for a hot product is that without the right personality you can&#039;t make that connection. I love your book because this is a perspective that you share - that brands need to get beyond buzz. It&#039;s also one that I just wrote a whole book about, and called it Personality Not Included. In both cases, something essential is missing - and the successful brands as well as the successful politicians are the ones that find a way to put it back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lois,</p>
<p>This is a great post because it comes down a fundamental truth about so many businesses and brands as well as politics &#8230; that &#8220;featurespeak&#8221; is ultimately not what people are buying. Hillary may have the best knowledge and facts at her disposal, for a politician that&#8217;s the equivalent of a product having the best features. The problem for her as for a hot product is that without the right personality you can&#8217;t make that connection. I love your book because this is a perspective that you share &#8211; that brands need to get beyond buzz. It&#8217;s also one that I just wrote a whole book about, and called it Personality Not Included. In both cases, something essential is missing &#8211; and the successful brands as well as the successful politicians are the ones that find a way to put it back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lois Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.foghound.com/blog/2008/05/12/goodbye-to-hillary-voting-on-feelings/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Lois Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foghound.com/262/#comment-547</guid>
		<description>Lissa,
I have to confess that I share some of the reverse prejudice.   Just shows that when it comes to stepping away from what worked before humans have a really hard time changing -- regardless of gender, age or race.
Lois</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lissa,<br />
I have to confess that I share some of the reverse prejudice.   Just shows that when it comes to stepping away from what worked before humans have a really hard time changing &#8212; regardless of gender, age or race.<br />
Lois</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lissa Bergin-Boles</title>
		<link>http://www.foghound.com/blog/2008/05/12/goodbye-to-hillary-voting-on-feelings/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Lissa Bergin-Boles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foghound.com/262/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>Well said.   Old schools vs new school - and boy, the leap&#039;s big, both in terms of behavior AND thinking.

Kind of the like the exec&#039;s blocking blogs thinking that strategy was &#039;a good thing&#039;.

Old school marketers used to selling and telling people rather than serving and relating with their product/services&#039; tribe/s find it really hard to talk with people.

As I just read recently (can&#039;t remember where), it&#039;s like &#039;someone handed the key&#039;s to the inmates&#039;...

As seems to be true for Mrs. Clinton, talking at rather than talking with was the right way to do things for a long, long time - as was learning how to say well what research advised was what their market wanted to hear.

Looks like we&#039;re finding out that being substantially knowledgeable used to be the primary currency of character (plus tenacity, et al):  now emotive wisdom and relationship skills, combined with substantial knowledge, is.

As is authenticity and integrity - another matter, but oh so vitally related.

New game.  New Rules.  To my mind, better in both regards, but boy its painful to watch good, hard-working, tenacious people slam into them without even knowing they&#039;re there.

And here&#039;s some reverse prejudice for you: I would have thought a woman would have more naturally and adroitly navigated these waters of relational change (as so many of us probably have - how&#039;s that for arrogant assumption?)

I was really hoping this woman would.

But in this new world, it seems clear that no matter what the product or service, if you&#039;re talkin&#039; at us (smart, tough and knowledgeable though you may be) passing go just ain&#039;t the sure bet it used to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.   Old schools vs new school &#8211; and boy, the leap&#8217;s big, both in terms of behavior AND thinking.</p>
<p>Kind of the like the exec&#8217;s blocking blogs thinking that strategy was &#8216;a good thing&#8217;.</p>
<p>Old school marketers used to selling and telling people rather than serving and relating with their product/services&#8217; tribe/s find it really hard to talk with people.</p>
<p>As I just read recently (can&#8217;t remember where), it&#8217;s like &#8216;someone handed the key&#8217;s to the inmates&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>As seems to be true for Mrs. Clinton, talking at rather than talking with was the right way to do things for a long, long time &#8211; as was learning how to say well what research advised was what their market wanted to hear.</p>
<p>Looks like we&#8217;re finding out that being substantially knowledgeable used to be the primary currency of character (plus tenacity, et al):  now emotive wisdom and relationship skills, combined with substantial knowledge, is.</p>
<p>As is authenticity and integrity &#8211; another matter, but oh so vitally related.</p>
<p>New game.  New Rules.  To my mind, better in both regards, but boy its painful to watch good, hard-working, tenacious people slam into them without even knowing they&#8217;re there.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s some reverse prejudice for you: I would have thought a woman would have more naturally and adroitly navigated these waters of relational change (as so many of us probably have &#8211; how&#8217;s that for arrogant assumption?)</p>
<p>I was really hoping this woman would.</p>
<p>But in this new world, it seems clear that no matter what the product or service, if you&#8217;re talkin&#8217; at us (smart, tough and knowledgeable though you may be) passing go just ain&#8217;t the sure bet it used to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

